Howdy folks, well, she had to go there, and I am speaking of one coronated Democrat “presidential nominee” Kamala Harris. Amazingly, she has become a presumptive presidential nominee for whom there has never been a single vote cast. Last week, in a campaign stop in Wisconsin following a resoundingly successful RNC convention, she spoke of her time as a prosecutor and how she had dealt with individuals like Donald Trump…so much for tamping down the temperature, huh? Well, since VP Harris took it upon herself to speak about prosecuting cases, I figured we could do the same.

I wonder what would be her defense against a case prosecuting her as a failed so-called Border Czarina? Of course, her leftist media allies are trying to tell us that she was never placed in the said position. Good try on that. We all remember Lester Holt asking her about having not been to the border and her insidious response “I have not been to Europe either.” Yeah, expect more half-wit responses like that in the coming months.

But what about prosecuting the tens of millions who have poured into this country illegally, in violation of our Constitution, in which Harris took an oath to uphold the laws of this Country? Would Harris prosecute those illegal immigrants who have murdered American women? Speaking of rape, Harris was recently in Texas for a sorority gathering but found little time to visit the family of Jocelyn Nungaray, a 12-year-old Texas girl brutally raped and killed by illegal immigrants. Would she take the case and prosecute the killer of Laken Riley? Heck, I have never even heard Kamala Harris say her name.

Would Kamala Harris prosecute the case of granting illegal immigrants driver’s licenses, which, under the 1996 Motor Voter Law signed by Bill Clinton, would allow them to register to vote? I think she spoke out against the SAVE Act, which would have specifically addressed this issue of preventing illegals from voting in American elections, talking about a threat to our representative democracy. Or would Harris prosecute the case of sanctuary cities and states that dismiss our rule of law and provide taxpayer-funded benefits to those who disavowed and broke our most basic law, the law of national sovereignty? Funny, we give free healthcare to illegals while our Veterans struggle.

Would Kamala Harris prosecute the case of District Attorneys like Alvin Bragg, releasing violent criminals back onto our streets? Who was not touched by the address of the woman from NYC who lost her son, a US combat veteran, to a murderous criminal released back onto the streets? Matter of fact, I think we know how Harris feels about this issue since it was this self-proclaimed prosecutor who aided and abetted domestic terrorists by raising bail funds for violent Antifa members and others to be released from jail. Now, ain’t that a daisy, as Doc Holliday would say, a prosecutor raising funds to release violent individuals from jail?

Would Kamala Harris prosecute her boss, Joe Biden, for violating the Constitution, as well as a Supreme Court decision, on college student loan debt? I mean, c’mon, Man, even Nancy Pelosi admitted that Biden did not have the enumerated power to do so, yet he did, does, and probably will continue to. It’s all about buying those votes. Well, Kamala, would you prosecute Joe for violating the Constitution and dismissing a ruling by the highest Court in the land? Nah, I did not think so because we all know of your animus towards this SCOTUS. You clearly showed that by not prosecuting one Senator Chuck Schumer, your former senatorial colleague, for his open threat toward two SCOTUS Justices, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, when he shouted that they would reap the wind and would not know what hit them. Later, of course, there was a thwarted assassination attempt of Justice Kavanaugh.

But, the greatest prosecution of Kamala Harris should be of her defrauding the American people by incessantly lying to us about the health and state of mind of Joe Biden. I mean, y’all ain’t had a doggone cabinet meeting since October of 2023! What in the Sam Hill have y’all been doing, Ma’am? And I am sure that you would not bring about prosecution of one Merrick Garland for his abject refusal to release the Robert Hur interview tapes of Joe Biden, again showing utter disdain for the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the ideals of coequal branches of government…seems like you and your kind are the real threats to our Constitutional Republic and its fundamentals.

In closing, yes, Kamala, we have also seen your type before…ascension by identity politics. In prosecuting the case against you, the American people can ill afford another empty suit, or pantsuit, wearing person in the White House. We will not be coerced, intimidated, threatened, or fear mongered into voting for you just to check leftist cultural Marxist boxes. We will be very astute and truthful in prosecuting the case against you, regardless of the media, entertainment, and political elites’ attempts to gloss over your evident failures. We will talk about your policies, like eliminating private healthcare insurance, a national universal basic income, and other delusional progressive socialist ideological positions that you embrace.

We do not want you to be the person in the room with Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Ayatollah Khameni, Islamic jihadists, or transnational narco-criminal terrorists. We all recognize that there is a contingent of individuals who are superficial and shallow in their thinking. Lenin called them useful idiots; you have their vote, all 35-40% of them.

But the case against you is strong, and we shall commit ourselves to prosecuting it judiciously. And this prosecution shall not ever rest.

Steadfast and Loyal.

This article originally appeared at TownHall.com