About ACRU Staff

The American Constitutional Rights Union (ACRU) is dedicated to defending the constitutional rights of all Americans. ACRU stands against harmful, anti-constitutional ideologies that have taken hold in our nation’s courts, culture, and bureaucracies. We defend and promote free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment, and national sovereignty.

Paulson v. City of San Diego

By |2008-03-11T23:02:10-04:00March 11th, 2008|

ACRU filed a brief in support of the City of San Diego in California state appellate court on appeal from a state judge’s order prohibiting the City from transferring the Mt. Soledad Memorial and its cross to the Federal government, as approved in a city referendum with 76% in support. The Federal government intervened to safeguard the monument by its powers of eminent domain; plaintiff Paulson is recently deceased. ACLU may file another suit challenging the Federal action.

On January 12, 2007, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the lawsuit to remove the memorial as moot and said a district court order to remove the […]

Paulson v. City of San Diego

By |2008-03-10T23:01:16-04:00March 10th, 2008|

ACRU filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the private association which had bought the Mt. Soledad property in the sale invalidated by the Ninth circuit. But the Supreme Court denied the petition because the Ninth Circuit had invalidated the sale based on the California state constitution.

Read the Brief

The ACLU Gets "Behind" Civil Liberties

By |2008-03-10T11:37:45-04:00March 10th, 2008|

The ACLU has applauded as a “civil rights victory” a

$65,000 settlement for a small-town art teacher who was fired from his job

for painting paintings on the Internet with his butt. Yes, you read that

right. It says what you thought it says.

* * *

The facts for this Outrage come from an article in the Danville, Va.,

Register & Bee for 10 March, 2008.

Stephen Murmer was fired last year as an art teacher at Monacan High School

in Chesterfield County, after students discovered a video of him in

disguise, calling himself Stan […]

Paulson v. City of San Diego

By |2008-03-09T22:58:31-04:00March 9th, 2008|

ACRU filed a brief in support of the City of San Diego in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on an appeal by Paulson from a Federal judge’s order approving the sale of the Mt. Soledad property including the cross to a private association. The three judge Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the sale as valid, as the ACRU brief urged. But Plaintiff won a rehearing en banc by the entire 9th circuit which reversed and invalidated the sale on the grounds that it amounted to an unconstitutional establishment of religion under the California constitution.

Read the Brief

Rumsfeld vs. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights

By |2008-03-09T13:09:22-04:00March 9th, 2008|

Decided by the United States Supreme Court on March 6, 2006, in favor of ACRU’s position. In this case the Supreme Court held that the Federal government has the power to condition Federal educational aid on maintenance of equal access to the campus for military recruiters as compared to other recruiters.

Read the Brief

Winkler v. Rumsfeld

By |2008-03-07T20:51:01-05:00March 7th, 2008|

This case involves whether use by the Scouts of a military base for their national Jamboree involves an unconstitutional establishment of religion. The District Court held that it does. Oral arguments were heard on the case in April of 2006, before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh District, in Illinois. On April 12, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed the case finding that the ACLU did not have standing..

Read the Brief

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

By |2008-03-06T20:51:39-05:00March 6th, 2008|

Case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 27, 2002 in favor of ACRU’s position. This case held that school voucher programs do not amount to an unconstitutional establishment of religion.

Read the Brief

Ken Blackwell and Sandy Froman: Judging Gun Rights: Are They Inalienable?

By |2020-04-23T21:53:48-04:00March 6th, 2008|

As a historic Supreme Court case on the Second Amendment looms, District of Columbia v. Heller, two unexpected perspectives show what is at stake in this case for all Americans. Between the two of us as authors, our commitment to the Second Amendment, coupled with our real-life experiences, explodes the stereotypical images of gun owners in America. We are living proof that the Second Amendment is a blessing for all Americans, and that all Americans have a vested interest in the pending court case.

Specter & Conservative Leaders Plan Judges Battle; Implications for Presidential Race Discussed; McConnell Laments Dems' "Judicial Confirmation Brinksmanship"

By |2008-03-06T11:15:37-05:00March 6th, 2008|

Specter & Conservative Leaders Plan Judges Battle Implications for Presidential Race Discussed McConnell Laments Dems’ “Judicial Confirmation Brinksmanship”

COMMITTEE FOR JUSTICE 1920 L Street, N.W. | Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20036

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 4, 2008

CONTACT: Curt Levey, (202) 270-7748,

clevey@committeeforjustice.org

Specter & Conservative Leaders Plan Judges Battle

Implications for Presidential Race Discussed

McConnell Laments Dems’ “Judicial Confirmation Brinksmanship”

WASHINGTON, DC – Monday afternoon, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Arlen Specter (R – Pa.) convened a meeting of conservative leaders […]

Go to Top