About ACRU Staff

The American Constitutional Rights Union (ACRU) is dedicated to defending the constitutional rights of all Americans. ACRU stands against harmful, anti-constitutional ideologies that have taken hold in our nation’s courts, culture, and bureaucracies. We defend and promote free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment, and national sovereignty.

Left-wing Censorship Campaign Targets Conservative Media by Cliff Kincaid for Accuracy in Media

By |2008-03-24T23:37:19-04:00March 24th, 2008|

“In his classic work about Washington double-standards that benefit the national Democratic Party, It Didn’t Start With Watergate, Victor Lasky described how Democratic administrations were guilty of some of the same things that forced the resignation of Republican President Richard Nixon, such as the use of “dirty tricks” against the opposition and compiling an “enemies list” of media critics…”

[…]

Accuracy in Media Special Report: Left-Wing Censorship Campaign Targets Conservative Media, by Cliff Kinkaid

By |2008-03-24T23:34:02-04:00March 24th, 2008|

“In his classic work about Washington double-standards that benefit the national Democratic Party, It Didn’t Start With Watergate, Victor Lasky described how Democratic administrations were guilty of some of the same things that forced the resignation of Republican President Richard Nixon, such as the use of “dirty tricks” against the opposition and compiling an “enemies list” of media critics… This time, the “conspiracy” is out in the open, as Accuracy in Media (AIM), the nation’s oldest and most respected media watchdog organization, has uncovered a plan to silence conservative voices in the media. All of the progress that conservatives have made in the media over the last […]

Accuracy in Media Special Report: Left-Wing Censorship Campaign Targets Conservative Media, by Cliff Kinkaid

By |2008-03-24T22:55:59-04:00March 24th, 2008|

“In his classic work about Washington double-standards that benefit the national Democratic Party, It Didn’t Start With Watergate, Victor Lasky described how Democratic administrations were guilty of some of the same things that forced the resignation of Republican President Richard Nixon, such as the use of “dirty tricks” against the opposition and compiling an “enemies list” of media critics… This time, the “conspiracy” is out in the open, as Accuracy in Media (AIM), the nation’s oldest and most respected media watchdog organization, has uncovered a plan to silence conservative voices in the media. All of the progress that conservatives have made in the media over the last […]

Department of Justice Web site: FISA 101: Why FISA Modernization Amendments Must Be Made Permanent

By |2008-03-24T17:21:48-04:00March 24th, 2008|

"FISA Amendments In The Protect America Act Of 2007 Remain Necessary To Keep Our Nation Safe: The Protect America Act modernized the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to provide our intelligence community essential tools to acquire important information about terrorists who want to harm America. The Act, which passed with bipartisan support in the House and Senate and was signed into law by President Bush on August 5, 2007, restores FISA to its original focus of protecting the rights of persons in the United States, while not acting as an obstacle to gathering foreign intelligence on targets located in foreign countries. By enabling our intelligence community to close a critical intelligence gap that existed before the Act became law, the Protect America Act has already made our Nation safer."

Columbia Professor and ACLU Claim Blacks Are Jailed for No Reason

By |2008-03-24T14:37:15-04:00March 24th, 2008|

An African-American professor at Columbia has written an

article, based on ACLU statistics, claiming that American states are

incarcerating black men at higher rates, and expelling black students at

higher rates, because they want to teach them that “their only future

resides in prison or jail.” It is the bias of the professor, and the ACLU,

which leads to that conclusion.

* * * *

The facts for this ACLU Outrage, but not the legal conclusions, come from an

article in The Free Press, on 24 March, 2008.

Dr. Manning Marable, […]

Heller v. DC

By |2008-03-23T20:43:38-04:00March 23rd, 2008|

Gun control laws in the District of Columbia effectively ban the use of handguns, or other guns, for self-defense within the home. Heller is a Federal security guard charged with helping to protect the Federal judiciary at the Federal Judicial Center in Washington DC. In that capacity, he is armed with a handgun for his work during the day. Heller wants to keep a handgun within his home in Washington DC for self-defense during the evening. He applied for a permit for such a gun but was denied, as required under DC law since 1976. He sued the city claiming that the DC gun control laws effectively […]

Crawford v. Marion County Election Board

By |2008-03-22T20:44:30-04:00March 22nd, 2008|

In 2005, the Indiana General Assembly passed legislation, signed by the Governor, to counter voter fraud by generally requiring those voting in person at the polls to identify themselves with a government issued photo ID, such as a driver’s license or a passport. The Indiana state Democratic Party, the Marion County Democratic Party, two elected Democrat officials, and several political interest groups filed suit alleging that this Indiana Voter ID law is unconstitutional because requiring such an ID imposes a severe burden on the right to vote.

Read the Brief

Rederford & Christy v. Hicks

By |2008-03-21T20:45:04-04:00March 21st, 2008|

This case presents increasingly urgent questions of law regarding the free speech rights of politically disfavored local minorities. The facts of this case reveal discriminatory prejudice against Christian employees by the City of Oakland reflected in viewpoint discrimination regarding their freedom of speech.

Read the Brief

John Armor Quoted about Latest ACLU Outrage

By |2008-03-21T01:56:48-04:00March 21st, 2008|

John Armor was quoted on March 20th on the latest ACLU Outrage: ACLU Wants the US to Lose the War on Terrorism on American Family Association’s OneNewsNow.com.
Says John:

“They do want to aid these guys,” he exclaims. “If you look at it politically, not legally, the ACLU wants the United States to lose in the war on terror because it feels that governments which are socialistic are preferred to what we have — and those are the kind of people we’re up against,” he adds. “Of course, the fact that they’re murderous dictators seems to escape […]

Go to Top