1/18: ACRU’s amicus brief argued that the district court’s demand for a redrawn legislative map was unreasonable.
North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein (D) has been accused of committing serious ethical misconduct in a brief filed before the United States Supreme Court.
This case is one among several voting-law disputes being waged in the court before the coming elections.
ALEXANDRIA, VA (June 20, 2016) — Opponents of North Carolina’s voter photo ID law wrongly sought to use an illegal interpretation of the Voting Rights Act to attack North Carolina’s election integrity law, the American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) argues in a brief filed on June 16 at the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.Regarding North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, et al. v. Patrick L. McCrory, et al., the brief, notes that a U.S. District Court rightly rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that the law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.In 2013, in Shelby County v. Holder, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Section [...]
The radical beliefs of these radical lawyers have turned into radical administration policies.
This ultra-liberal alliance is boldly trying to prosecute their political opponents who hold dissenting views on climate change.
As a result of North Carolina’s changes in its election laws, not only did turnout not decrease as opponents had predicted it would, but turnout actually went up.
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Feb. 4, 2015) -- The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals was mistaken when it overruled a District Court's opinion upholding a law reforming North Carolina's voting process just before the 2014 election, the American Civil Rights Union argues in a brief filed Feb. 4, 2015 urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the state's appeal.READ THE AMICUS BRIEF HERE. (PDF 111KB)