Enforcing ‘Public Charge’ Rule in Immigration Is Common Sense
8/22: The latest claims against the Trump administration over its enforcement of the “public charge” provision in federal immigration law are nonsensical.
8/22: The latest claims against the Trump administration over its enforcement of the “public charge” provision in federal immigration law are nonsensical.
1/19: On January 19, the Supreme Court granted review in this blockbuster case.
1/19: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski speaks on the Larry O'Connor Show about Supreme Court taking up the arguments on Donald Trump's Immigration Travel Ban.
President Donald Trump’s new immigration policy is partially back in force as of late Monday, but only until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit can decide the case’s merits.
The lower courts had misapplied the First Amendment and interfered with the president’s constitutional executive power.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit took the extremely rare step of ordering that the constitutional challenge to President Donald Trump’s immigration travel order would be heard by all 15 judges.
It is unlikely that the Trump administration will petition the Supreme Court to review this particular decision, which concerned only the first policy, Executive Order 13769.
A second federal judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s new executive order (EO) on immigration travel, while the federal judge who blocked the first EO is reserving judgment on the revised EO.
If any federal court refuses to dismiss a lawsuit based on the old executive order, then that may be the first issue on this controversy to reach the Supreme Court.
A county judge in Florida has ruled unconstitutional on Tenth Amendment grounds another of President Donald Trump’s executive orders on immigration, this one concerning federal funding for sanctuary cities.