8/22: The latest claims against the Trump administration over its enforcement of the “public charge” provision in federal immigration law are nonsensical.
6/10: There are many Americans who would be alive today if we had control over our southern border and if there were no sanctuary policies in place.
4/12: Just another example of a single federal district court judge going far beyond the bounds of his authority and interfering with the president’s ability to deal with a national security and humanitarian crisis.
1/16: ACRU Policy Board member and Professor of Economics Dr. Walter E. Williams explains why Leftists use immigration as a political issue and ignore facts.
7/17: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky explains the inherent biases in the immigration courts.
3/14: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky explains why thwarting federal law is a poor idea for sanctuary cities.
1/25: The battle occurring in Congress over providing amnesty, citizenship and government benefits to illegal aliens often boils down to well-worn talking points.
12/28: History shows that providing amnesty will attract even more illegal immigration and won’t solve our enforcement problems.
Holder’s goals seem to have stayed the same; it’s just the playing field that has changed.
On a warm spring Monday in the nation’s capital, the future of American immigration policy and the limits on executive power were argued before the U.S. Supreme Court.