Truth revealed: Liberal plans to change the Supreme Court

By |2020-11-03T09:57:32-05:00November 3rd, 2020|

In every election, when you vote for your presidential candidate of choice, you also “vote” for a potential SCOTUS nominee. It has never been more true than in 2020. Liberals send (deliberately?) mixed messages on SCOTUS policy. In this article, Hillsdale College’s Matthew Spaulding provides both historical and contemporary information to help us become more informed on this important subject.

What ‘court-packing’ is – and isn’t

By |2020-10-28T20:20:41-04:00October 28th, 2020|

The SCOTUS nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett brought up an inside baseball term that needs defining. “Court-packing” is NOT a duly elected president filling a vacant seat as duty demands. Court-packing is adding judicial seats — by one political party — where justices serve in perpetuity. It ensures the packing party has decades of unilateral ideological control. Every candidate for president has a moral obligation to explain it truthfully to the American people while stating personal intent.

Klukowski: Democrats Threaten SCOTUS with Court Packing

By |2020-04-23T21:53:46-04:00August 13th, 2019|

8/13: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski reports on the Democratic politicians and presidential candidates threatening the Supreme Court with court packing if they do not offer liberal rulings on the Second Amendment.

Title

Go to Top